Impression management online dating

Matchmaking mobile applications, or dating apps, have become hugely popular in recent years, with millions worldwide swiping through potential romantic partners. The literature on technologically mediated dating has explored how people manage impressions but has rarely taken an autoethnographic perspective: How does the author, both a researcher of dating apps and a user herself, experience self-presentation? In this paper, I first introduce a theoretical focus on impression management on dating apps. Next, I explain the choice of autoethnography as a method. Drawing from various source materials like personal journaling and chats with matches, I present two autoethnographic pieces: one focusing on my self-presentation as a dating app researcher, and the other on my own dating app use. I follow these by analyzing my motivations and impression construction in the dating app environment, keeping in mind theoretical insights.

Romantic Relationships and Online Dating

Skip to search form Skip to main content You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly. DOI: Online dating systems are now widely used to search for romance and yet there is little research on how people use these systems to manage their impressions with potential romantic partners.

Berger and Barasch examine a failure of impression management in a different domain—on-line profile pictures. Although users of social networking and dating​.

Abstract Social networking sites SNS offer various opportunities for communicating personal information, thus providing an ideal setting for getting in contact with other users. An analysis of online profiles showed that singles disclosed more photographs of themselves on their profiles than people in relationships. The highest numbers of friends and wall postings were shown by people who did not reveal their relationship status.

Singles displayed more groups on their profile and were more likely to join user groups dealing with parties, sexual statements as well as fun and nonsense. Results therefore indicate that — although SNS are not especially dedicated to dating behavior — self-presentation is nevertheless affected by the potential to form romantic relationships. Therefore, relationship status is suggested as a further factor which affects online impression management, besides, for example, socio-demographic aspects, personality traits and culture.

Keywords: social networking sites; self-presentation; impression management; need to belong. Therefore, presenting him- or herself in a positive and elaborated way can be seen as one way to establish new contacts and thereby satisfy the so-called need to belong. Nowadays, with the help of social networking sites SNS on the Internet such as Facebook, further possibilities are given to present oneself to others: Users can, for instance, upload photographs, join groups, and provide personal information.

This online impression management can therefore also be useful to attract potential partners. According to previous studies on Web 2. In general, online impression management must be seen as a very complex phenomenon that is affected by the expectations of the audience as well as by personality characteristics e. Against this background, we aimed to analyze the role of relationship status in online self-presentation as one important factor that has not yet been considered.

Through a detailed analysis of randomly selected profiles of the German social networking community StudiVZ, we aimed to investigate how self-presentation strategies of singles, persons in a relationship, and users who do not reveal their relationship status differ.

Impression Management Struggles in Online Dating

Sign In. Advanced Search. Article Navigation.

Impression Management Struggles in Online Dating Doug Zytko Sukeshini A. Grandhi Quentin Jones New Jersey Institute of Technology Eastern Connecticut.

JulieAnn Miller , Purdue University. People often use strategic self-presentation to portray themselves in a favorable light. During the study, participants were led to believe that they would meet a potential dating partner, when in reality the potential partner situation was achieved through a cover story. These self-ratings involved two trait variables positive traits and negative traits, based on four specific traits and one interest variable based on two specific interests , which were endorsed in the fictitious partner profile.

It was expected that, among participants whose responses were allegedly shown to their partner public response condition , participants would be more likely to change their self-ratings if they believed the partner moderately liked them moderate perceived liking , compared to if they believed the partner liked them a lot or a little high, low perceived liking, respectively. The results failed to support this hypothesis. Exploratory analyses for several different moderators are discussed.

Off-Campus Purdue Users: To access this dissertation, please log in to our proxy server. Advanced Search.

Impression management through communication in online dating

Academic journal article Journal of Research in Gender Studies. The adoption of cutting-edge technology constitutes a conventional fashion for users to make contact with romantic partners. Chin et al. Yeo and Fung, Mobile dating applications may function as a way to get in touch with sexual partners, while quite a few of persons who utilize such applications may raise their sexual risk by participating in unprotected intercourse.

Impression management. Self-esteem. Online dating. Computer-mediated communication. Mode-switching. a b s t r a c t. Online daters may be aware that online.

To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F. Add open access links from to the list of external document links if available. Privacy notice: By enabling the option above, your browser will contact the API of unpaywall. Although we do not have any reason to believe that your call will be tracked, we do not have any control over how the remote server uses your data.

So please proceed with care and consider checking the Unpaywall privacy policy. For web page which are no longer available, try to retrieve content from the of the Internet Archive if available. Privacy notice: By enabling the option above, your browser will contact the API of web. So please proceed with care and consider checking the Internet Archive privacy policy. Add a list of references from , , and to record detail pages.

Janelle’s tweets

Internet Deception. Search this site. Computer Mediated Communication. Deception and Social Media.

Read “Impression Management Struggles in Online Dating” on DeepDyve, the largest online rental service for scholarly research with thousands of academic.

Hancock, visibility of research on a social groups. Paulhus found that a school textbook, drives. Love systems is little. Love systems, research giving related links college of wisconsin system and escalator industry. In help terms of profile picture attractive bio communication guidelines. Thirty-Four individuals.

Putting Your Best Cyberface Forward

The full article is available online, and the abstract is below. Matchmaking mobile applications, or dating apps, have become hugely popular in recent years, with millions worldwide swiping through potential romantic partners. The literature on technologically mediated dating has explored how people manage impressions but has rarely taken an autoethnographic perspective: How does the author, both a researcher of dating apps and a user herself, experience self-presentation?

In this paper, I first introduce a theoretical focus on impression management on dating apps. Next, I explain the choice of autoethnography as a method. Drawing from various source materials like personal journaling and chats with matches, I present two autoethnographic pieces: one focusing on my self-presentation as a dating app researcher, and the other on my own dating app use.

Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. ​Journal of Computer-Mediated. Communication​, 11, –

To browse Academia. Skip to main content. Log In Sign Up. Download Free PDF. Impression Management Struggles in Online Dating. Doug Zytko. Sukeshini Grandhi. Quentin Jones. Online dating systems are now widely used to search for romance In spite of this general awareness of online dating issues, our and yet there is little research on how people use these systems to knowledge of the processes involved in online dating interactions manage their impressions with potential romantic partners.

To is limited. While it is not clear why users find the online dating address this issue we conducted an interview study of 41 online process so frustrating, one popular belief held by users and dating users, revealing that—contrary to prior work—online researchers is that online daters intentionally deceive their daters largely do not want to intentionally deceive their online potential partners in an attempt to appear more attractive [23].

In this paper 18], but these studies focus solely on demographic qualities as we present various frustrations online daters associate with listed on profile pages and seldom take into account personality conveying and forming impressions of potential romantic partners traits that are also important to the evaluation of potential before meeting face-to-face.

“Impression management through communication in online dating.”

DO you bite your nails? Have you pierced your tongue? Yet we commonly shape our behavior or tweak our appearance in an attempt to control how others perceive us. Some call it common sense. Leary, a professor of psychology and neuroscience at Duke, who has been studying impression management in the real world for more than 20 years.

Leary said of a study he began last month about how people edit their online personas.

She currently researches how people create and manage impressions on digital media, examining mobile dating apps. Correspondence.

Applied Cyberpsychology pp Cite as. The influence of technology in our lives has seeped into nearly every aspect of how we relate to others. We connect with our friends and family through text, email, social networking sites SNS , and instant messaging to name but a few. Through a variety of online platforms we seek old and new friends, business partnerships and collaborations, employers and employees and of course, we seek candidates for those relationships most dear to us, romantic relationships.

This chapter cannot attempt to address the vast area of how technology changes the ways in which we interact in all of our relationships, but rather will focus on the influence of technology and the Internet on our romantic relationships, in particular how we find those relationships through online dating. Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Skip to main content. This service is more advanced with JavaScript available.

Erving Goffman and You: Impression Management


Hello! Do you need to find a partner for sex? Nothing is more simple! Click here, registration is free!